Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Joel Klein Is Buying Rupert Murdoch's Failed Education Business

Rupert Murdoch and Joel Klein

Carlo Allegri / Reuters

Rupert Murdoch's failed education venture, Amplify, is being sold to a management team that includes Joel Klein, Amplify's CEO, according to an internal email to the company's staff obtained by BuzzFeed News. Amplify fired about 40% of its 1200-person staff earlier today.

Klein, a close ally of Murdoch's who was formerly the chancellor, of the New York City public school system, is stepping down as Amplify's CEO, the email said, but will continue to serve on Amplify's board.

In August, Murdoch's News Corp announced that it was writing down the value of its Amplify unit, which it had previously heralded as an attempt to disrupt the education industry. Troubled early on by a high-profile scandal involving the meltdown of its signature tablets, Amplify's failure to make any significant inroads in the education industry marked a rare defeat for Murdoch.

News Corp announced the sale of Amplify in a press release, but did not reveal the purchaser or the sale price, saying only that the business will be sold to "a management team supported by a group of private investors."

"We are extremely proud of the crucial work that the Amplify team has done to create a digital platform for the future," News Corp CEO Robert Thomson said in the announcement. "All who have been involved in the Amplify business at News Corp should be conscious of their contribution to education in the US and beyond."



Joel Klein Is Buying Rupert Murdoch's Failed Education Business http://ift.tt/1RgIscb

SoFi's Billion Dollar Funding Round Is One Of The Biggest Ever

The online lender is one of just six American startups to ever raise $1 billion in a single funding round.

AP

One of the superstars of the online lending industry has raised $1 billion from investors, in one of the largest funding rounds ever for an American startup.

SoFi announced today that it was raising the new equity from Japanese technology conglomerate Softbank — a new investor — along with existing investors like the the hedge fund Third Point.

This comes after a $200 million round early this year that valued the company at just over $1 billion. While SoFi didn't disclose a valuation this time around, the Wall Street Journal reported in August that the Softbank investment would value the company at about $4 billion, making it the most valuable privately held online lending startup.

There has only been 19 venture capital funding rounds worth $1 billion or more, according to Pitchbook, which tracks the industry. Four of those were for Uber; just six American companies, including SoFi, have ever completed a billion-dollar round.

On Tuesday, online lender Avant said it had raised $325 million in a funding round that valued the company at $2 billion. Prosper, which mostly does personal loans to people with good credit scores, was valued at $1.9 billlion in its most recent round. Lending Club, another online lender, went public in December of last year and, despite its stock sinking below its IPO price, has a market capitalization of almost $5 billion.

SoFi, which was founded in 2011, started out refinancing student loans. That can be a great business in a growing economy, as many college graduates may be considered risky borrowers by traditional metrics (they have no income, for instance, and can have very large outstanding debts), but actually have good job and income prospects. When SoFi was founded in 2011, the first loans were to graduates of elite business schools like Stanford, where its founder, former Wells Fargo trader Mike Cagney, graduated from.

SoFi also expanded into mortgages late last year and now offers mortgages in 23 states. It started offering personal loans in February, and has begun selling those loans to investors.

"We have an aspiration to change banking and create an alternative solution to allow people to check out of the banking system entirely," Cagney said, mentioning wealth management and insurance as possible areas SoFi could enter.

But that won't be happening in the public markets, for now. After the company raised $200 million and garnered a billion-dollar "unicorn" valuation, there were reports that the company was considering an initial public offering.

But like so many fast-growing startups (Cagney says SoFi has been profitable for two years), they were able to raise a massive round from a new private investor and stay insulated from the public markets.

Cagney described Softbank as a "long term, patient capital partner" that told SoFi it was able to grow even faster than the company previously thought. "Personal and mortgage loans were growing ahead of schedule and we needed incremental capital to support that growth," Cagney said.

Lending Club "went out there and raised $1 billion publicly and they have to deal with the public," Cagney said. "We could raise $1 billion from the private investor."



SoFi's Billion Dollar Funding Round Is One Of The Biggest Ever http://ift.tt/1L4zHBl

Ralph Lauren To Staff: "I Am Not Stepping Down...I Am Stepping Up"

Ralph Lauren, who named a new CEO to his namesake company yesterday, told employees he’s not stepping down or stepping back, in a letter obtained by BuzzFeed News.

Lauren during New York Fashion Week this month.

Mike Coppola / Getty Images

Ralph Lauren, the designer and founder of the namesake brand, made headlines after naming a new CEO to Ralph Lauren Corp. yesterday. But he wants to be clear that he's still very much holding the reins.

In a letter to employees today obtained by BuzzFeed News, Lauren said he wants "to be clear about what this means for my role and lay to rest any misconceptions about what some of the press reported yesterday."

"The Ralph Lauren Corporation is the company I founded, nurtured and love," the 75-year-old wrote. "I am not stepping down, nor am I stepping back. I am stepping up."

The full memo is included below.

The company said yesterday that Stefan Larsson, the global president of Gap's Old Navy and a leader at H&M before that, will become CEO in November and report to Lauren. Lauren will "continue to actively drive the company's vision and strategy" as executive chairman and chief creative officer, according to a statement.

The executive may be feeling slighted after Ralph Lauren's stock, which fell more than 40% this year through yesterday, jumped after news of Larsson's appointment. Many outlets reported that Lauren is stepping down and that Larsson is "taking over."

The New York Times described the management change as "the coming end of a golden era of American postwar designers," citing the exits of Donna Karan and Calvin Klein from their namesake brands, while Bloomberg News said Ralph Lauren as a company is "a bit stodgy and stale," and quoted an analyst saying the brand needs "a serious face-lift."

"My job is to think about the future and how to move forward, and I am confident that Stefan Larsson will be a wonderful business partner to help carry out this shared vision," Lauren said in the letter to employees. "As the largest shareholder, I will continue to nurture and grow this company."

Lauren has led the company for about 48 years. The retailer brought in about $7.6 billion in sales in its most recent year.

Memo from Ralph Lauren



Ralph Lauren To Staff: "I Am Not Stepping Down...I Am Stepping Up" http://ift.tt/1FFoiYc

Workers Lose Fingers And A Leg In Accidents At KFC Supplier

Chicken producer Case Farms is set to be fined $1.4 million for health and safety violations in 2015.

Fred Tanneau / AFP / Getty Images

A large chicken supplier for supermarkets and fast food chains, including Kentucky Fried Chicken, is facing more than $1.4 million in fines after gruesome industrial accidents led to one teenage worker's leg being amputed below the knee and 24-year-old losing two fingertips.

Both workers were fired after being maimed in the accidents at an Ohio processing facility frun by Case Farms Processing Inc., according to the Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

"I would consider this company one of the worst of the worst," OSHA Spokesperson Scott Allen told BuzzFeed News. "Especially for a 17-year-old, who shouldn't have been working there in the first place, to have been injured."

The agency levied fines against Case Farms and cleaning subcontractor Cal-Clean, which employed the teenager who lost his lower leg. Both companies were cited for exposing workers to hazards including amputations, falls, and risk of electrocution.

Allen said OSHA also has regulations on the books prohibiting workers under 18 from working with or around machinery that could put them at risk of amputations. A representative from Cal-Clean reached by phone declined to comment.

Case Farms said in a statement, "While we do not deem it appropriate to comment on ongoing administrative matters, we do not agree with the negative characterizations that have been made about our company and our employees," and noted its Ohio facilities received two awards for safety programs in the past six months.

"Our employees are our most important resource and we continue to focus on providing a safe and healthy work environment. The citations are being reviewed and we will work with OSHA, as we have in the past, to address the concerns outlined in the citations," the statement said.

Poultry processing has long been known as a dangerous job. OSHA says workers in the industry suffer work-related injuries and illness at more than twice the national average.

Fred Tanneau / AFP / Getty Images

Headquartered in North Carolina, Case Farms employs more than 3,200 workers who process nearly 3 million chickens per week at North Carolina and Ohio facilities. The company produces more than 900 million pounds of fresh, partly cooked, and frozen poultry products, including chicken tenders for KFC.

KFC did not respond to a request for comment.

According to the agency, the fingertip amputations occurred when a 24-year-old employee was cleaning a fat sucker machine on March 25. Parts of the machine's plunger amputated the middle and ring fingertips of the workers' right hand, and the company was faulted for allowing the machine to operate as it was cleaned. Having worked at Case Farms for nearly a year and a half, the worker was first suspended from his job for 10 days and subsequently fired.

Just weeks later, OSHA said, a 17-year-old employee of Cal-Clean, also known as Callaghan and Callaghan, had half of his left leg amputated as he cleaned a liver-giblet chiller machine. Unable to return to work due to his injuries, the teen was also fired after the incident.

OSHA maintains that Case Farms is responsible for exposing the teen worker to operating machinery because it never installed safety mechanisms. The agency also cited Cal-Clean for failing to report the amputation within 24 hours, as required by law.

"A teenager's life has been forever altered because of a devastating leg injury just weeks after starting this job," said Dr. David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health in a statement. "OSHA will continue to inspect, monitor and penalize this company until it makes necessary improvements."


View Entire List ›



Workers Lose Fingers And A Leg In Accidents At KFC Supplier http://ift.tt/1RgkH4a

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Online Lender Avant Gets $2 Billion Valuation

The company will use the proceeds of a massive $325 million funding round to expand its business of making unsecured personal loans over the internet.

J. Scott Applewhite / AP

Avant, the almost three-year old year old online lender that was once known as AvantCredit, is the latest startup financial services company to be valued at over $1 billion by private investors.

The company said today it has raised $325 million in equity from investors, at a valuation of $1.975 billion. News of the round was first reported by Fortune.

Avant largely makes unsecured personal loans to people with credit ratings that are better than subprime but below superprime — a niche it says the fast-growing online lending industry has overlooked. Companies like Prosper and Lending Club, which make mainly personal loans, tend to focus on lenders with very good credit.

Prosper has been valued at $1.9 billion in its latest valuation, while SoFi, which started out refinancing student loans, has been valued at $4 billion. At just shy of $2 billion, Avant fits between the two.

Avant mostly lends to borrowers with credit scores between 580 and 720, "the 45% to 50% of consumers who are not subprime and superprime," Al Goldstein, Avant's 34-year old cofounder told BuzzFeed News.

The loans have annual rates of between 9% and 36%, and Goldstein could eventually go as low as 5% to 6%. The average loan size is $8,000, but can get as high as $35,000.

The latest round of funding includes existing investors like RRE Ventures and Tiger Global Management, along with the venture capital General Atlantic, which lead the round (General Atlantic is also an investor in BuzzFeed). Avant changed its name from AvantCredit in April.

Avant / Via avant.com

Avant's focus on so-called near-prime borrowers puts more pressure on its underwriting software, which use over 1,000 attributes to figure out whether an applicant is likely to repay what they owe. The company also needs to pay close attention to loan servicing, which is done entirely in house rather than outsourced. Avant doesn't charge any fees on its loans and keeps about half of them on its own balance sheet, selling the rest to investors.

"We have skin in the game," said Goldstein, a former investment banker and real estate investor. "We take on the same kind of risk as our partners and marketplace participants."

Lending Club, the publicly traded online lender, sells off its loans to individual and institutional buyers, charging between 1% and 5% in origination fees.

Avant's massive funding round comes at a time when big online lenders are able to raise money at high valuations from private investors, but are losing favor in the public markets. Lending Club, which went public in late 2014, is trading at around $13.50, below its $15 IPO price, while OnDeck, which makes loans to small businesses, is trading at less than half its $20 IPO price.

"Lending Club is below its IPO price, but trades at rich valuation, it still is valued at an attractive price," Goldstein said. "We're very different, we're growing much faster, we have a very broad focus and a larger subset of consumers."

Because Avant keeps so many of its loans on its balance sheet instead of selling them off, it needs new money to grow. The company has raised over $650 million in equity and over $1 billion in debt; it has sold $1.8 billion in loans to investors.

Avant has originated $1.7 billion in loans this year, "faster than any marketplace platform," Goldstein says. Prosper has originated $4 billion in loans in nine years (although nearly all those loans were made after 2012). Goldstein says Avant is looking to originate at least $4 billion next year and says the company is cash-flow positive and will be profitable going forward.

Johanthan Krongold, a managing director at General Atlantic who will join Avant's board, said that all this growth is happening even as underwriting gets more conservative. "Despite having accelerated growth at scale, their loans and charge offs and defaults have fallen precipitously over the past few years and their underwriting has gotten more stringent and loss rates have fallen significantly."

The boom in online lending has come as the economy has grown steadily and unemployment has remained low, making it easier for borrowers to pay back their loans.

Goldstein said Avant's no-fee model, which keeps a sizable portion of loans on its books, creates more incentive to be careful in choosing who to lend to. "We're not going to originate for the sake of originations," he said. "The key to managing cycles is at some point you have to slow down, you have to manage your risk."


View Entire List ›



Online Lender Avant Gets $2 Billion Valuation http://ift.tt/1iZTRCf

In Schools, Google's Laptops Will Soon Outnumber All Other Devices Combined

Kevin Jarrett CC BY / Via Flickr: kjarrett

There will be more Google Chromebooks in American classrooms by the end of the year than all other devices combined, Google said today at a company event in San Francisco.

The figure is a striking indication of how quickly, and thoroughly, Google has come to dominate the massive education technology market. In 2012, Chromebooks made up just 1% of devices in American schools; iPads had a more than 50% market share. But by 2014, according to market research firm IDC, Chromebooks were outselling iPads in education.

About 30,000 Chromebooks have been activated every day since the beginning of the school year this September, mostly in schools, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said at the event.

Chromebooks were able to overtake iPads in education because they're far cheaper — sometimes under $200 — have keyboards, and don't require additional software because they only run Google's Chrome browser.

When it began to make a push to sell its devices in schools, Google already had a strong foothold in many classrooms thanks to free apps like Google Drive and Docs. It also rolled out Google Classroom, a learning management tool that lets teachers collect assignments and give feedback using the company's cloud-based storage and word processing tools.

Google is also making a push to get its low-cost virtual reality viewing device, Google Cardboard, into classrooms. The cardboard viewers will allow students to go on simulated field trips and will be provided free to schools.



In Schools, Google's Laptops Will Soon Outnumber All Other Devices Combined http://ift.tt/1iJgE4i

The Riskiest Student Loans Are The Smallest Ones, Study Says

Alex Brandon / AP

A new analysis of student loan borrowers shows that, contrary to public perception, those who borrow the least are most likely to default on their loans.

The study, which examined borrowing by community college students in Iowa, found that 31% of those with loan balances of less than $5,000 defaulted, compared with 22% of those who owed between $10,000 and $15,000. The national average default rate across all educational institutions is less than 14%.

The study adds credence to a changing understanding of the $1 trillion student debt crisis, suggesting that the riskiest borrowers are not those who have taken out tens of thousands of dollars in loans to cover high tuition costs, but those who borrow in small amounts.

So far there has been little effort by the federal government to help such borrowers, according to the study, released Monday by the Association of Community College Trustees. But that could change: the Obama administration has recently made free community college a key part of its education agenda, proposing a national program and pushing states to adopt their own initiatives.

Though a relatively small percentage of community college students, around 17%, take out federal loans — and borrow much less than those who attend pricier colleges — those that do borrow are more likely to default than students at both public schools and for-profit colleges. The national three-year default rate for community college students is 21%, compared to 19% at for-profit colleges.

And while the figures involved are lower, failing to repay loans can still throw borrowers into a cycle of financial troubles, with few options to emerge from default and no way to discharge loans in bankruptcy.

"The repercussions of default are the same whether you default on a $35,000 loan or a $3,000 one," said Colleen Campbell, one of the report's authors. "The hit on your credit stays for seven years," Campbell said, which can be devastating for low-income borrowers.

Community colleges, open-access institutions which typically accept all students, have traditionally had sky-high dropout rates, which the analysis indicated were likely tied to loan defaults. The vast majority of Iowa students who defaulted on their loans, almost 90%, never earned a credential of any kind, and 60% earned fewer than 15 credits, the report found. Twenty-six percent of students who defaulted didn't earn a single credit.

And few community college students made use of any of the federal programs meant to help people avoid default, like deferral, forbearance, or income-based repayment. That is in part because federal programs themselves fall short when it comes to low-income borrowers at community colleges with low loan balances, said Campbell.

Enrolling in an income-based repayment plan, for example, is a complex process, requiring submitting tax documents as proof of income every year, although Campbell said a significant portion of low-debt borrowers earn too little income to have to file taxes. And in the standard repayment plan, the minimum monthly payment set by the government — $50 — is often too steep for many to afford, and makes little sense for a loan with a balance of less than $5,000.

"If I borrowed $1,000, none of the programs work for me," said Jee Hang Lee, the vice president of public policy at the Association of Community College Trustees, a trade group.

The analysis found that two-thirds of students who defaulted had never made a single payment on their loan, with the majority defaulting within the first year — an indication that they were likely misinformed about how to repay their loans or whether they owed any money at all, said Campbell.

"There's something that’s not sticking with them about the borrowing process," she said. "There may not be enough done on the front end" to ensure that borrowers know they are taking out loans they are obligated to repay whether or not they earn credits or credentials.

The analysis also pointed to potential problems with student loan servicers, who the government relies on to communicate with borrowers, and collections agencies, which it charges with helping students who have gone into default. The Education Department has previously found fault with collections for failing to accurately inform borrowers, especially about plans like income-based repayment; it fired five of them in February for providing "inaccurate information."



The Riskiest Student Loans Are The Smallest Ones, Study Says http://ift.tt/1iIISw6

Monday, September 28, 2015

Whole Foods Is Expanding Self-Service And Cutting Jobs

The company is cutting 1,500 jobs — about 1.6% of its workforce — and introducing new labor-saving technology in its stores.

That Other Paper / Flickr / Via flic.kr

Whole Foods Market will eliminate 1,500 jobs ahead of the holiday season, the company said in a regulatory filing Monday, as the company tests new technology to cut down on labor costs.

The grocery chain said it is cutting the jobs as part of a broader plan to "invest in technology upgrades while improving its cost structure" and lower prices. On a recent earnings call, co-CEO Walter Robb announced new technology being rolled out across stores, including a self-service kiosk for ordering prepared food and a new labor scheduling system.

Tech-aided efforts to cut costs come as the company tries to shake its "Whole Foods, Whole Paycheck" image and expand beyond the rich neighborhoods where its core customers live. The chain has been working on a new line of lower-priced stores called 365 by Whole Foods Market, which are also expected to have lower labor costs.

Analyst Mark Miller with William Blair & Company Equity Research said in a note that the cuts can be viewed "as a streamlining initiative," as the company will still be adding positions in aggregate (staffing rose by 9,000 last year).

David Shankbone / Flickr / Via flic.kr

Whole Foods's recent investments in technology include partnerships with grocery delivery service Instacart and mobile payment services from Apple, Google and (soon) Samsung. The company also has big hopes for online ordering.

CIO Jason Buechel told the Wall Street Journal last year that digital shoppers fill their carts with as much as 2.5 times the products of their brick-and-mortar counterparts, and that Whole Foods was focused on developing a redesigned app, loyalty program, new point-of-sale platform, and enhanced data analytics.

It's also squeezing out labor costs by making it easier for customers to serve themselves. At an investor day in April, operations chief Jason Lannon noted that the company's self-serve salad and hot food bars sell higher volumes of food than any other section of the store.

"We sell more of that than we sell milk or bananas or any of those staples. That's our bread-and-butter," he said. "And as we've introduced that self-service concept to other products that used to be full-service, customers will buy more and it takes the labor out of our system."

Many other food businesses have noted the uptick in sales when customers are left to order, pay and serve themselves — at Taco Bell, people added more extras to their burrito when ordering via touchscreen kiosk than speaking to a human. Some think it's there's a shame factor involved.

"Where we used to serve customers pizza, they would often buy one slice but, miraculously, when they serve themselves, they buy two slices," Lannon said.

"Same thing goes for cakes, right?" asked an analyst. "They're buying two cakes instead of one."

"Exactly," Lannon said. "You bought a cake, yesterday, it's like, well....it's a beautiful thing and it's really working."


View Entire List ›



Whole Foods Is Expanding Self-Service And Cutting Jobs http://ift.tt/1WuxZNc

Keurig's Home-Brew Coca-Cola Machine Launches Tuesday

Sales of both Keurig coffee makers and soda are declining. But both Keurig and Coca-Cola are betting consumers will want to make their own soda at home.

Keurig Green Mountain / Via keurig.com

For more than a century, Coca-Cola has closely guarded its soda recipe and the production of it. The black fizzy drink has been something that came ready made from a soda fountain at a restaurant, or from bottles and cans at stores or vending machines. Chances were, it came from a bottling facility somewhere far far away.

But beginning tomorrow, Coca-Cola will offer its consumers the ability to do something they've never been able to before: to make a Coke at home. The option comes via a partnership between the drinks giant and K-Cup maker Keurig Green Mountain, which on Tuesday will launch its new Keurig Kold machine.

The Keurig Kold is countertop pod appliance, much like Keurig's coffee machines, and launches for sale online on Tuesday. In retail outlets, there will be a limited launch in certain cities — including Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, and New York — ahead of the crucial holiday shopping season. Keurig Kold won't be available nationally until the 2016 holiday season.

The machine works with pods which will contain a syrup for a specific soda, say, Coca-Cola, Sprite, or Fanta (so you can't mix your own flavors), as well as a chamber with carbonated beads. Unlike the well-known SodaStream machines, the fizz comes from the pods, rather than a carbonator in the appliance.

Coke's brands won't be the only ones available for the new machine. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, the maker of Dr Pepper, 7 Up, and Canada Dry, is also making its brands available on Keurig Kold.

Venessa Wong / BuzzFeed News

Soda consumption is declining. Sales of Keurig's mainstay product — the single-serve coffee maker — are down. An established at-home soda maker, SodaStream, is battling declining U.S. sales. And lastly, consumers have voiced discontent about the amount of waste produced by plastic single-serve pods.

On top of that, the Keurig Kold machine isn't cheap: it costs from $299 to $369. Each pod, which will make one 8-ounce soda, will cost about $0.99 to $1.29, steep compared to what consumers are accustomed to paying for a soda at home.

Coca-Cola has enough confidence that people want a pod-powered soda machine that it now has a 16% stake in Keurig. "We're very excited about Keurig Kold," said the President of Coca-Cola North America J. Alexander "Sandy" Douglas, Jr. at a conference in May. "What Keurig brings is a strong technology capability ... We think it's innovative."


View Entire List ›



Keurig's Home-Brew Coca-Cola Machine Launches Tuesday http://ift.tt/1Fy8UNx

Child Farmworkers Banned From Handling Pesticides, But Not Tobacco

New rules from the EPA include a ban on workers under 18 handling toxic pesticides, although children 16 and younger can still legally work in the fields.

GVnayR, Wikimedia Commons

Those who plant, tend, and harvest the food American families put on their tables will now enjoy more of the safety measures that already cover workers in most other jobs. The Environmental Protection Agency announced Monday that the country's two million agricultural workers will get new protections from toxic pesticide use.

"The same rules that have protected other American workers from dangerous cancer- and birth-defect causing pesticides are finally going to protect farmworkers under the new EPA regulations," said United Farm Workers (UFW) President Arturo Rodriguez. "It's been a long time coming, but it has come today."

The rules, last updated two decades ago, include increased safeguards for whistleblowers, new record-keeping requirements, additional postings of information on hazards and rights, and an age minimum of 18 years for workers that apply pesticides in the fields.

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said the changes will reduce risks of injury and illness for those working on farms, in forests, greenhouses, and nurseries, which result in sick days, lost wages, and medical bills.

Environmental Protection Agency

Rodriguez called the updated rules "momentous" and a dream realized for the farmworkers who fought for their rights in the days of UFW founder César Chávez, citing Chávez's question, "What good does it do to achieve the blessings of collective bargaining and make economic progress for people when their health is destroyed in the process?"

But while the new prohibition on children under 18 handling pesticides is undoubtedly good news for the country's youngest farmworkers, labor activists argue that many will continue being exposed to another serious health risk: nicotine, from the tobacco fields where plenty of children still work each day.


View Entire List ›



Child Farmworkers Banned From Handling Pesticides, But Not Tobacco http://ift.tt/1Wugwo7

A Startup Bids Farewell To Its $15,000 A Month Desert Mansion

Zenefits, a Silicon Valley startup, rented the luxurious property as a crash pad for visiting employees. But the days of the “Zenemansion” are coming to an end.

Google / Via Google Maps Street View

For the employees of one Silicon Valley unicorn, the days of lounging poolside under a flaming desert sunset are coming to an end.

For the past year, Zenefits, one of America's most highly valued tech startups, has paid $15,000 a month for a luxurious home in a wealthy Arizona suburb, BuzzFeed News has learned. But the San Francisco-based Zenefits, which lacks profits and is burning its way through the $500 million it raised from investors in May, has decided it no longer needs the 5,000-square-foot dwelling.

Now, the landlord tells us, Zenefits is letting the lease expire at the end of October.

The five-bedroom property was intended as a crash pad for Zenefits employees from San Francisco visiting the company's office in Scottsdale, which it opened last year. The company says it rented the the five-bedroom home rather run up frequent hotel bills.

The rental, located in the upscale suburb of Paradise Valley, was quite the crib. Real estate listings, as well as videos obtained by BuzzFeed News, show a palatial residence equipped with a pool, hot tub, grand piano, outdoor grill area, six bathrooms, a wine closet, and a games room with a card table, billiards table and bar.

Employees, who made full use of the house during a rollicking holiday party last year, affectionally call it the "Zenemansion."

But now, with the Scottsdale office up and running, Zenefits is building up a new facility in nearby Tempe, which eventually will house the majority of its Arizona business. And that means letting go of the Zenemansion.

"The house was used consistently by employees at all levels — including the CEO — and saved Zenefits tens of thousands of dollars on hotel costs," said Zenefits spokesperson Kenneth Baer in an emailed statement. "Zenefits is letting the lease expire because the company is moving the bulk of its Arizona operation to Tempe, and the house is no longer convenient."

BuzzFeed News

While not a household name to most Americans, Zenefits is a darling of the Silicon Valley establishment. The startup, which makes software to help small businesses manage their employee benefits, was valued at $4.5 billion in May, just two years after launching. That turned it into a "unicorn," the term for startups worth at least $1 billion.

Its investors include Hollywood celebrity Jared Leto, as well as a roster of prominent venture capitalists. The powerhouse venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz has put more money into Zenefits than in any other startup in its portfolio. (Andreessen Horowitz is also an investor in BuzzFeed.)

But even its powerful friends acknowledge Zenefits is pursuing a risky course. It is using its pile of venture capital to expand at a breakneck pace, hiring lots of salespeople in an effort to win ever more small business customers. The hope is that Zenefits will finally turn a profit when it gets big enough — but there is no guarantee that this will happen, particularly if it grows too quickly to adequately serve its customers.

Despite its lofty valuation, Zenefits eschews some of perks, like free lunches, that are commonplace at other tech companies. The CEO, Parker Conrad, has said he won't consider job applicants who ask whether they'll be served free lunch.


View Entire List ›



A Startup Bids Farewell To Its $15,000 A Month Desert Mansion http://ift.tt/1Jz0eRE

Chipotle's Nine-Month Carnitas Nightmare Is Almost Over

The chain says carnitas are back at 90% of stores.

instagram.com

Chipotle announced on Monday that with its new U.K. pork supplier Karro, it has brought back carnitas to 90% of its restaurants. But the Carnitas Crisis isn't over just yet: Chipotles in the Cleveland and Atlanta areas, and in North Carolina and South Carolina, are still pork-free zones.

The Denver-based burrito chain has been working to restore supply for most of 2015. The trouble began back in January, when Chipotle suspended a pork supplier that violated its animal welfare standards, which prohibit the use of antibiotics and gestation crates. As a result, the company was immediately unable to supply more than one-third of its restaurants with carnitas. By July, about 40% of our restaurants still didn't have carnitas. Today's announcement marks the winding down of a small nightmare for the chain.

The nightmare is small, because carnitas account for just 6% to 7% of entree orders at Chipotle. That's enough that the company cited the carnitas shortage for denting growth in the second quarter, when same store sales increased 4.3%.

Overall, however, the impact is minimal compared to what it could have been if Chipotle had run into issues with its chicken or beef suppliers. Chicken is by far the most popular meat, followed by steak, reported the Associated Press.

Chipotle reinforced its commitment to its ingredients standards by pulling carnitas from menus rather than substituting in pork that didn't meet its requirements. Presumably, it would have been harder to make the same call about a meat that accounted more than 7% of entrees.

Eric / Via Flickr: sirira2000

"Yes, it's hard to find supply," spokesman Chris Arnold said to BuzzFeed News. "We have always faced some challenge in getting the ingredients we use, but have a remarkable track record overcoming those hurdles."

Even as carnitas return to Chipotle's menus, the new pork from U.K.-based Karro is slightly different from its U.S. supply. Chipotle explains on its site that while the pork "we buy from U.S. farmers comes from pigs that were never given antibiotics, Karro follows European standards that allow for antibiotics to be administered when necessary to keep an animal healthy." It goes on to say, "While we prefer to buy pork raised entirely without antibiotics, we are proud to be serving pork from Karro because the responsible way Karro uses antibiotics is consistent with their extremely high animal welfare standards."

Chipotle, which has 1,850 restaurants, has been a pioneer in fast food in terms of ingredients and animal welfare standards, which many consumers have applauded. Other chains are following suit, for example, with McDonald's and Chick-fil-A making their own commitments about antibiotics use in chicken.

Chipotle's nine month-long incident shows, however, that when a problem arises, it can take a while to resolve — a fact that some of fast food's larger chains must be considering too.


View Entire List ›



Chipotle's Nine-Month Carnitas Nightmare Is Almost Over http://ift.tt/1Lh7Gs9

Sunday, September 27, 2015

Here's A Closer Look At The 34 Ingredients In A Cool Ranch Dorito

How many foods have an ingredient called “blue”?

final gather / Via Flickr: 23629083@N03

Most processed foods contain a long list of additives — but have you ever wondered what they would really look like if you broke down a food into its component ingredients? How blue is Blue No 1? What form does pure riboflavin take?

A new book, Ingredients: A Visual Exploration of 75 Additives and 25 Food Products, separates each of the ingredients that make up some of our favorite snacks, and explains what these additives really are.

Here, for example, are the 34 ingredients that make up a Cool Ranch Dorito:

Here, for example, are the 34 ingredients that make up a Cool Ranch Dorito:

01 Corn
Vegetable Oil:
02 Corn oil; 03 Canola oil; 04 and/or Sunflower Oil;
05 Maltodextrin (made from corn); 06 Salt; 07 Tomato powder; 08 Cornstarch; 09 Lactose; 10 Whey; 11 Skim milk; 12 Corn syrup solids; 13 Onion powder; 14 Sugar; 15 Garlic powder; 16 Monosodium glutamate
Cheddar Cheese:
17 Milk; 18 Cheese cultures; 19 Salt; 20 Enzymes; 21 Dextrose; 22 Malic acid; 23 Buttermilk; 24 Natural flavor; 25 Artificial flavor; 26 Sodium acetate
Artificial color including:
27 Red No. 40; 28 Blue No. 1; 29 Yellow No.5;
30 Sodium caseinate; 31 Spices; 32 Citric acid; 33 Disodium inosinate; 34 Disodium guanylate

Dwight Eschliman / Via Ingredients: A Visual Exploration of 75 Additives & 25 Food Products

"The idea that everything with a long chemical name is definitely bad for you is just plain stupid,"

Additives are used "for at least one of four reasons: to make the food product more nutritious, to make it easier to prepare, to make it more appealing, or to make it stay fresh longer." Most of the time, the goal is to makes foods more cost efficient.

For instance, azodicarbonamide (ADA), or the so-called "yoga mat chemical" found in breads, "gives strength to dough and makes baked goods lighter because it helps with gas retention," Ingredients explains. Yet "technically speaking, you are never actually eating ADA; once it hits the moisture in dough, it converts into harmless biurea, an organic water-insoluble chemical compound that passes through your body without effect."


View Entire List ›



Here's A Closer Look At The 34 Ingredients In A Cool Ranch Dorito http://ift.tt/1JwSAXV

Friday, September 25, 2015

Wall Street Breathes Very Temporary Sigh Of Relief After Boehner Resignation

There’s possibility of a government shutdown has decreased in the short term, analysts say. But the longer-term outlook for economic fights in D.C. remains grim.

Astrid Riecken / Getty Images

Wall Street analysts think John Boehner's surprise resignation means the government will be funded through December, but it may raise the chance of a confrontation over the debt ceiling later this year.

"All indications are that lawmakers will avoid a government shutdown next
week by agreeing to a clean continuing resolution funding the government into December," Compass Point analyst Isaac Boltanksy wrote in a note following news that Boehner will step down. "But it sets the stage for a broader fiscal fight encompassing the debt ceiling, government spending, and tax extender."

Chris Krueger, an analyst at Guggenheim Securities, said in a note that the possibility of a government shutdown at the beginning of October was lowered from 30% to 15%, but said that there's a higher chance of "some kind of accident that would keep Congress from raising the debt ceiling around Thanksgiving."

Krueger estimates the Treasury will hit the debt ceiling between November 15 and December 15, and that "the Tea Party will have more power and influence mapping out the House agenda and strategy." Krueger, like many Wall Street analysts who follow Washington, saw Boehner as someone who ultimately wouldn't let the government trip over its statutory spending limits. "Without Boehner, all bets are off," he wrote.

But with years of debt ceiling close calls and even a two week shutdown in October, 2013, investors and traders have assumed that eventually, everything gets hashed out and nothing too weird or awful will happen. "Markets have grown comfortable with fiscal cliffs due to the repetitive nature of the debates and the known cast of characters," Boltansky wrote.

A team of Goldman Sachs analysts wrote earlier this week that the debt limit would likely to be breached sometime in November, but that the government will have enough cash on hand to keep spending through early December. Even if the debt ceiling is eventually raised and the government doesn't, say, miss interest payments on its debt, brinksmanship can still have negative economic effects. The 2011 and 2013 debt ceiling shutdown "had discernible effects," on the economy a Congressional Research Service report said.

"The August 2011 debt limit impasse coincided with a marked decline in consumer confidence, small business optimism, and the S&P 500 stock index, and an increase in the equity market volatility index...In each case, these indicators did not return to their previous levels until several months after the debt limit was raised." The Government Accountability Office said that borrowing costs for the federal government rose slightly in 2011.

Regarding the 2013 showdown, which featured an actual government shtudown, the CRS notes that "those same indicators showed a much smaller deterioration in October 2013."

The Goldman analysts said there is some possibility that with Boehner no longer having to win over the restive House Republicans, he could now choose to bring up a vote to fund the government, as well as a debt limit extension. If he can't pass one before he leaves, however, "the prospects of a volatile debt ceiling debate this winter have increased dramatically," Boltansky wrote.



Wall Street Breathes Very Temporary Sigh Of Relief After Boehner Resignation http://ift.tt/1VecdQS

JustFab Investor Quietly Scrubs Mention Of Co-Founders' Shady Past

Matrix Partners once hailed the weight loss powder Sensa as a past success of JustFab co-founder Adam Goldenberg. Not anymore.

Matrix Partners / Via matrixpartners.com

Matrix Partners, an early investor in e-commerce company JustFab, has quietly edited its website after a BuzzFeed News investigation into the unsavory past ventures of the JustFab's co-founders.

Before the article was published, the "Founder Stories" section of the Matrix website included praise for Sensa, a bogus miracle weight loss powder previously peddled by the JustFab co-founders. As part of a stinging deceptive advertising judgement against Sensa, the Federal Trade Commission described Sensa's marketing pitch — that sprinkiing the powder on food would help you lose weight — as being akin to promoting a "magic pixie dust."

Sensa via FTC / Via ftc.gov

Sensa was closed down after the company agreed to one of the largest deceptive advertising settlements in FTC history. But up until Thursday, Matrix Partners still celebrated the business as an example of the many successes of the JustFab co-founders, Adam Goldenberg and Don Ressler, at their previous holding company, which was a seed-stage investor in JustFab.

"The company became the home to SENSA, a weight-loss system based on groundbreaking research from Dr. Alan Hirsch," the website said.

That portion has now been deleted after BuzzFeed News reported on Thursday that Goldenberg and Ressler are being sued by Bank of America and a distributor over the collapse of Sensa, which went out of business last year about 10 months after the FTC slapped it with a nearly $50 million judgment.

Just seven months after the judgement, a JustFab funding round valued the company at $1 billion.

Josh Hannah, the Matrix general partner who sits on JustFab's board, didn't return emails and a message left at his office seeking comment. He also didn't return requests for comment for the initial BuzzFeed News story.

JustFab, which sells monthly subscriptions to shoes and clothing under the JustFab, ShoeDazzle and Fabletics names, has been inundated with complaints over its business model. Women have claimed it's unclear they're signing up for subscriptions and that the subscriptions are difficult to cancel. The company says unhappy users make up a fraction of its more than 3.5 million happy members.

Goldenberg and Ressler have faced similar complaints since at least 2004 on products including anti-cellulite cream and anti-aging shampoo, BuzzFeed News found.

(h/t Hacker News for pointing out the deletion.)


View Entire List ›



JustFab Investor Quietly Scrubs Mention Of Co-Founders' Shady Past http://ift.tt/1G7R1Q5

Tons Of People Have Gotten Screwed Over By Kate Hudson's Athletic Wear Company

Fabletics, and the $1 billion startup that owns it, JustFab, have gotten more than 1,000 complaints calling the companies a scam. A BuzzFeed News investigation found that JustFab’s co-CEOs and co-founders have been conning consumers into unwanted subscriptions since at least 2004.

JustFab, the startup that owns Kate Hudson's workout clothing line Fabletics, Kim Kardashian's ShoeDazzle, FabKids and FL2, is reportedly valued at more than $1 billion.

JustFab, the startup that owns Kate Hudson's workout clothing line Fabletics, Kim Kardashian's ShoeDazzle, FabKids and FL2, is reportedly valued at more than $1 billion.

Kardashian co-founded ShoeDazzle, which was sold to JustFab in 2013. Kate Hudson co-founded Fabletics and is regularly in its ads.

Michael Buckner / Getty Images

But in recent years, the monthly subscription shoe and clothing shop has been deluged by complaints over unauthorized credit card charges and deceptive advertising, BuzzFeed News found.

But in recent years, the monthly subscription shoe and clothing shop has been deluged by complaints over unauthorized credit card charges and deceptive advertising, BuzzFeed News found.

Fabletics / Via Fabletics.com

Women have complained that it's not clear they're signing up for subscriptions with JustFab and Fabletics, which refer to them as "VIP Memberships." Others complain that it's difficult to cancel, as cancellations can only be made over the phone.

Women have complained that it's not clear they're signing up for subscriptions with JustFab and Fabletics, which refer to them as "VIP Memberships." Others complain that it's difficult to cancel, as cancellations can only be made over the phone.

JustFab / Via justfab.com

Yet many seem to continue to be charged even after they said they canceled, or get put through an arduous process to even get a customer service rep on the phone.


View Entire List ›



Tons Of People Have Gotten Screwed Over By Kate Hudson's Athletic Wear Company http://ift.tt/1LScMW9

Thursday, September 24, 2015

$2 Trillion Worth Of Tech CEOs Met With Chinese Premier Xi In Seattle

The Pope may lure the masses, but it’s the Chinese leader who can bring together the masters of the technology universe.

In the lead-up to his dinner at the White House planned for Thursday night, Chinese premier Xi Jinping met with the people who really run things: CEO's of the world's biggest tech companies.

And when Mr. Xi is in town, people clear their schedules. Here's a picture of the Chinese leader with the tech execs, who met at a business forum Wednesday in Seattle.

Ted S. Warren / AP

The people surrounding President Xi represent about $2 trillion worth of companies, including the most valuable tech companies in both the U.S. and China.

Here's the lineup:

Front row, from left: Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, JD.com's Liu Qiangdong, Cisco's John Chambers, Alibaba's Jack Ma, IBM's Ginni Rometty, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Microsoft's Satya Nadella, China's Internet czar Lu Wei, Apple's Tim Cook, Tencent's Pony Ma, and Amazon's Jeff Bezos.

Middle row, from left: Sohu's Zhang Chaoyang, AMD's Lisa Su, Lenovo's Yang Yuanqing, Microsoft's Harry Shum, Qualcomm's Steve Mollenkopf, CETC's Ziong Qunli, Intel's Brian Krzanich, Qihoo 360's Zhou Hongyi, LinkedIn's Reid Hoffman, and SINA's Cao Guowei.

Back row, from left: Sugon's Li Jun, Didi-Kuaidi's Cheng Wei, Broadband Capital's Tian Suning, CEC's Liu Liehong, Baidu's Zhang Yaqin, AME Cloud Ventures' Jerry Yang, Inspur's Sun Pishu, AirBnB's Brian Chesky, and Sequoia Capital's Shen Nanpeng.


View Entire List ›



$2 Trillion Worth Of Tech CEOs Met With Chinese Premier Xi In Seattle http://ift.tt/1NXgG65

JustFab: The Billion Dollar Startup With A Dark Past

Kate Hudson cofounded Fabletics.

Michael Buckner / Getty Images

In January of last year, Adam Goldenberg reached one of the largest-ever deceptive advertising settlements with the Federal Trade Commission, with one of his companies agreeing to pay more than $26 million in penalties for peddling a miracle weight-loss powder. Seven months later, he received a different kind of honor: JustFab, his e-commerce startup, was valued at $1 billion by investors, making it a “unicorn,” Silicon Valley’s most coveted achievement.

The journey of Goldenberg and his longtime partner, Don Ressler, from the murky fringes of internet marketing to the pinnacle of paper wealth in Silicon Valley is the story of how two men, for a decade, have been conning consumers into subscriptions for anti-aging shampoo and wrinkle cream under the guise of “brand-building” and “innovation.” Since at least 2004, consumers have accused the men’s businesses of exploiting their credit card information and sticking them with unwanted charges — complaints that are stacking up at JustFab and Fabletics.

But that history hasn’t stopped some in tech from viewing its business as The Next Big Thing. The men have raised more than $300 million in equity funding for JustFab, more than either Gilt Groupe or Warby Parker, from venture capital firms like Matrix Partners and Technology Crossover Ventures — small shops by Silicon Valley standards, but ones that have invested in other big names like Gilt, Dollar Shave Club, and Spotify.

It also hasn’t turned off JustFab’s celebrity backers, including Kimora Lee Simmons, who served as JustFab’s creative director until May, as well as Kate Hudson and her brother Oliver. And it has attracted little scrutiny from the tech and business press that have covered JustFab’s rise, with outlets like Bloomberg News and the Wall Street Journal instead focusing on its lucrative business model, which is to sign up shoppers to recurring $30 to $50 monthly subscriptions for discounted clothes and shoes. Consumers, even if they don’t choose to receive any items, are charged unless they remember to opt out in the first five days of the month.

It’s a model the company says will rake in $500 million this year across sites including JustFab, Kate Hudson’s Fabletics, FabKids, ShoeDazzle, and FL2. That puts the company in the big leagues: The Container Store brought in about $780 million in sales last year, while Vera Bradley posted about $509 million in revenue. While JustFab has yet to post a profit, Goldenberg recently deemed last year’s funding a “pre-IPO round.” A spokesperson for JustFab said the company is on track to post a profit this year.

It didn't take long for Intelligent Beauty to face the same consumer backlash Alena's products drew.

The BBB fielded hundreds of complaints regarding the company's free trial offers and frustrating return processes between the end of 2006 and 2010, according to documents from the Business Consumer Alliance. The FTC, in response to BuzzFeed News' FOIA request, shared 66 complaints made about Intelligent Beauty between 2010 and 2013 naming Kronos, Sensa and JustFab. Consumer watchdogs criticized a number of its ads, and in 2009, Bare Escentuals sued Intelligent Beauty for making a blatant knockoff of its Bare Minerals line and advertising it as "Better than Bare." Part of the company's beef with the brand: "highly misleading and fraudulent" offers. The lawsuit was settled in 2010.

Intelligent Beauty's tactics disproportionately hurt poor customers who were hit with unexpected overdraft fees after failing to return products or cancel unwanted subscriptions. That same problem features in plenty of complaints today about JustFab and Fabletics; the company line is that JustFab doesn't reimburse users for "non-company charges" like bank fees and phone bills.

"I didn't believe that I would have the astounding results shown on the imagery in their advertising," read one complaint from the end of 2008. "But I had hoped for something better than what I got...SCREWED!"

But while JustFab has revenue streams befitting a unicorn, its predecessor companies were less ethereal beasts. For more than a decade, starting at MySpace’s parent company, Goldenberg and Ressler’s customers have frequently complained of getting tricked into recurring credit card charges and fooled by deceptive advertising and misleading promises — promises the FTC said sounded “like magic pixie dust” in a warning to consumers regarding the diet product Sensa. It made more than $300 million in sales before the federal regulator intervened.

The ugly hallmarks of those past enterprises live on in JustFab: The company and its affiliates, for all their happy customers, have often been accused of deceiving shoppers who think they’re making a single purchase into signing up for a subscription that automatically charges them each month unless they opt out within a five-day window. The sites use terms like “VIP Membership” instead of “subscription,” and JustFab and Fabletics in particular downplay the options for avoiding charges each month; cancellations require lengthy phone calls.

Consumer watchdogs have received a flood of complaints over the practices, and Facebook, Twitter, and review sites are home to many others from the U.S., the U.K., and Australia.

Goldenberg has deemed such complaints to come from “a very, very small minority” of unhappy users, but the numbers are considerable. JustFab amassed more than 1,400 Better Business Bureau complaints between August 2012 and the middle of last month. To put that in perspective, it’s more complaints than Time Warner Cable racked up in New York City in the same period; Spirit Airlines, one of the country’s most-hated companies, racked up about 2,500. JustFab has hardly the name recognition of those companies. Its accreditation with the BBB was revoked in May.

The FTC, in response to a Freedom of Information Act Request from BuzzFeed News, sent over another 234 complaints about JustFab from consumers railing against deceptive subscriptions and excessive email marketing.

Its legal troubles have also mounted, with the company reaching settlements over its business practices with a group of district attorneys in California, the Florida attorney general, and a separate Florida consumer who filed a lawsuit in 2011.

“As a company that has gone from 0 to in excess of 3.5 million customers in five years, we have had inevitable bumps along the way,” JustFab’s spokesperson said in an email, noting that the business has at least an 8 out of 10 on ResellerRatings.com from more than 60,000 consumers. “Customer satisfaction is a top priority for us and when there are issues with service, product quality, shipping deadlines, and the like we always do everything we can to make it right.” The spokesperson said the BBB complaints represent less than 0.001% of the 3.5 million customers JustFab acquired in the same period.

Goldenberg, 34, and Ressler, 43, declined to be interviewed for this story.

Click Here Copywriting & Creative

There’s a chance, of course, that all of the people who feel duped by JustFab are wrong.

But Goldenberg and Ressler have faced precisely these kinds of consumer complaints — thousands, in fact — about a long list of miracle weight-loss and beauty products since at least 2004. There were the Dream Shape diet pills, meant for consumption before bedtime — “Dream Shape Burns Fat While You Sleep.” There was the Hydroderm Body Shape Cellulite Toning Lotion, “the ‘secret weapon’ that will help tone and firm the areas that exercise alone can’t shape.” (That one got dinged by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.)

Later there were Kronos hair products, sold as “Botox for your hair,” and Raw Minerals, a knockoff of the better-known BareMinerals makeup line. Most notoriously, there was Sensa, a weight-loss powder that claimed if you sprinkled it on meals before eating, you would lose an average of 30 pounds in six months without making any changes to your diet or exercise habits. It just made you feel full, Sensa said, citing clinical studies alongside photos of juicy hamburgers and cheese pizzas. “Eat yourself skinny!”

Click Here Copywriting & Creative / Via clickherecreative.com

Sensa agreed to a nearly $50 million judgment with the FTC last year, though it could pay only about half that. (Ressler wasn’t named in it.) Goldenberg and Ressler are still fighting lawsuits over Sensa after the business collapsed late last year, including one from Bank of America that also names JustFab as a plaintiff.

For at least six brands associated with the two men before JustFab and Fabletics, customers complain they signed up for a “free trial” of the product, entering their credit card details to cover a $4 to $5 shipping fee. But if the product wasn’t returned within a few weeks — and accounts from customers say this was incredibly tough to do — they ended up with anywhere from $50 to $100 in charges and a recurring subscription that was a nightmare to cancel.

That might sound familiar to disgruntled JustFab customers today. The billion-dollar company paid $1.88 million last year to settle a consumer protection lawsuit out of the Santa Clara and Santa Cruz district attorney offices that alleged its brands, including Fabletics and the Kim Kardashian-associated ShoeDazzle, failed to “clearly and conspicuously” explain that its advertised discounts required a “monthly and automatically-charged subscription fee.”

“We were concerned that consumers had signed up for essentially a shoe or an outfit of the month club without enough disclosures where the consumer could determine that,” said Kelly Walker, Santa Cruz County assistant district attorney. “This is becoming a business practice that we’re becoming very concerned about. We are setting up a task force here in California just to deal with these companies with automatic renewal or automatic negative option sales programs.”

“From day one, we have been upfront about our flexible subscription model, the value it creates for our customers, and its terms of service,” JustFab’s spokesperson told BuzzFeed News.

JustFab’s backers have little to say about the company, its predecessors, and the litany of complaints against them. Passport Capital and Technology Crossover Ventures declined to comment while Matrix Partners and Rho Ventures didn’t return multiple phone calls and emails. JustFab told BuzzFeed News it doesn’t publicly disclose the full membership of its board of directors, though press releases have named TCV’s John Drew, Rho’s Mark Leschly, and Matrix’s Josh Hannah. Reps for Kimora Lee Simmons and Kate Hudson also declined to comment.

Walker, the Santa Cruz assistant DA, said his first contact with Goldenberg involved Sensa. In 2012, before the FTC stepped in, he was part of a group of California DAs who reached an $800,000 settlement with Sensa and its parent company, Intelligent Beauty, after finding fault with the company’s advertising claims, its use of the word “free,” and, of course, its automatic subscription enrollment and shipment of products to customers.

Walker added, “We were aware of him, and now we’re aware of other companies that he’s involved with doing the same kind of thing.”

The MySpace Connection

Goldenberg and Ressler met in the early 2000s at Intermix Media, the parent company of MySpace, where both worked in its Alena product marketing division. The unit was never as well-known as MySpace, but it was the company’s main profit engine up until 2005, when Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation acquired Intermix for $580 million, mostly for the social network. (That was back when $580 million was a lot of money to pay for a website.)

Goldenberg, a wunderkind who joined Intermix in his late teens, became the president of Alena in 2004. The unit trumpeted its expertise in cost-effectively building brands online and selling “high margin” and “innovative” items straight to consumers. In practice, it was papering the internet in ads for Dream Shape diet pills and Hydroderm antiwrinkle creams, promising “better than Botox” results and offering up free trials.

From left: Don Ressler, Kimora Lee Simmons, and Adam Goldenberg.

John Sciulli / Getty Images

Alena was responsible for most of Intermix’s $79 million in revenue for the year ended March 31, 2005. In regulatory filings, its growth was consistently attributed to higher sales on a subscription basis, where “customers agree to accept regularly scheduled shipments of selected products.” As it would be for many other items associated with Goldenberg and Ressler during the next decade, the first purchase was always facilitated through a “risk-free trial.”

But the trial wasn’t really free or riskless, as journalist Julia Angwin wrote in her 2009 book, Stealing MySpace: The Battle to Control the Most Popular Website in America: “Customers were charged a shipping and handling fee of $5.95 and were automatically enrolled for monthly shipments of $49.95 bottles of wrinkle cream. Customers often failed to cancel before the first shipment arrived, and the Internet message boards were full of complaints from customers lamenting Hydroderm’s tactics.”

The Business Consumer Alliance, which is the former Los Angeles affiliate of the BBB and oversees complaints to the bureau made before March 2013, sent BuzzFeed News more than 600 complaints filed against Alena between 2004 and 2006 from across the country.

Sensa via FTC / Via ttps://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cases/140107sesnaexhibits.pdf

Intelligent Beauty: New Name, Same Thing

Goldenberg and Ressler left Intermix shortly after the News Corporation acquisition, creating an entity called Brand Ideas, which merged with a marketing group to become Intelligent Beauty in 2007, according to its website at the time. The two men were co-CEOs of the company, which would later spawn Sensa and JustFab. Intelligent Beauty said it planned to use the internet and home-shopping channels to “powerize” its “electronic brand building” efforts.

In practice, that meant a factory of winking pop-ups, banner ads, advertorials, and landing pages everywhere from Yahoo Mail to AOL and MSN, displaying pictures of old women transforming into young ones and scales tipping to lighter numbers. The rapid A/B testing and modification of these ads has always been Goldenberg’s strength, said two former employees, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Spammy examples still live on the website of one of its marketers, Click Here Copywriting & Creative, which heralds its abilities to feed search engine spiders and design clicky, “emotionally charged” ads.

It’s the kind of thing you look at and instinctively want to close.

Sensa via FTC / Via ftc.gov



JustFab: The Billion Dollar Startup With A Dark Past http://ift.tt/1FwOKD7

Wednesday, September 23, 2015

Uber Launches Carpool Service In China In Drive For Market Share

Introducing UberCommute: For drivers who don’t actually want to be drivers, but are willing to pick someone up on their way to work.

Stephen Lovekin / Getty Images

With the ride-hail industry's battle for the hearts and wallets of users in China and India as competitive as ever, Uber on Wednesday will start testing a new carpool service in a bid to unlock the power of the casual Chinese driver — and gain highly coveted market share.

Uber still has a ways to go before it catches up to the market share of its competitors in either China or India, but the company has managed to keep up with — and in some cases, outpace — Didi Kuaidi and Ola in terms of the products and services.

So what to do when its biggest U.S. competitor, Lyft, announces it is teaming up with the dominant ride-hail player in China? To steal a phrase from Lyft, Uber is attempting to "unlock every seat, in every car" by testing out a new carpool service — UberCommute — for commuters willing to pick up a passenger going their way.

UberCommute is the company's attempt to activate a pool of drivers in China that it often touts in the U.S.: The casual driver. Opening up the Uber platform to people outside the pool of professional drivers may give the company's supply the boost it needs to continue to compete with Didi Kuaidi and now Lyft.

On the rider side, the service — which Didi Kuaidi already offers — works almost exactly like it works if the rider was hailing a People's Uber Plus, which is UberChina's answer to UberPool. The difference comes from the driver side.

Drivers, or Uber hopes, commuters, simply input their destination and the routing algorithm will match them with a passenger who is close to their starting location and heading to a destination close to their own. In other words, the algorithm treats the driver as if they're another UberPool passenger waiting for a second passenger to join them on the ride.

At launch, Uber is testing UberCommute in Chengdu, with plans to expand the service throughout the country and eventually into markets outside China, including the U.S.

Versions of services like UberCommute already exist in other markets. In Israel, for instance, Google-owned mapping company, Waze, began piloting a carpooling service in July. In the U.S., Uber's own former chief technology officer and co-founder Oscar Salazar launched Ride, which works basically the same way that UberCommute will work with a few exceptions. For one, Ride typically matches co-workers with similar commutes. And instead of being paid for the service, Ride drivers simply split the cost of expenses, such as gas, with their passengers.



Uber Launches Carpool Service In China In Drive For Market Share http://ift.tt/1LvcpVH

Striking Warehouse Staff Call On Amazon For Better Pay And Conditions

Workers at a major distribution center in Los Angeles aren’t directly employed by the e-commerce giant. But they insist it should take responsibility for their conditions.

Davis Turner / Wikimedia Commons / Via commons.wikimedia.org

The busiest container port in the Western hemisphere is ever so slightly less busy.

Staff at a major LA warehouse serving Amazon and other big retailers went on strike Tuesday, protesting unpaid wages and overtime, dangerous conditions, a lack of breaks and water during hot summer months, and retaliation by management against their organizing efforts. The strike continued on Wednesday.

The stoppage is the latest tactic in a campaign to improve conditions at the distribution center at the Port of Los Angeles, according to Sheheryar Kaoosji, director of the Warehouse Worker Resource Center. Workers and advocates have previously filed an Unfair Labor Practice complaint, a class action lawsuit, and an Occupational Safety and Health complaint, the last of which triggered an ongoing investigation. The other cases are pending.

An Amazon spokesperson said the company had no statement on the matter.

The non-union workers at the distribution center are a classic illustration of the "Who's the Boss?" problem that is widespread in the modern labor market: They are contracted by a staffing agency, which is contracted by the warehouse operator, which is contracted by Amazon and others. The multiple layers mean each party can claim it has little leverage to determine pay and conditions.

Green Fire Productions / Flickr


View Entire List ›



Striking Warehouse Staff Call On Amazon For Better Pay And Conditions http://ift.tt/1QyT4Cp

Fortune Gets An Ivy League Partner For Online Business Education

Fortune

For business-minded men and women looking for a qualification from an institution a bit more prestigious than a mere Ivy League university, help is on the way. Cornell University is adding some gravitas to its offerings by teaming up with Fortune magazine to offer an online business certificate program.

The Fortune-Cornell tie-up is the latest in a steady stream of media companies getting their piece of the online education industry. Last year, Wired launched its own degree program with the University of Southern California, a master's in Integrated Business, Design and Technology. And there's the Forbes School of Business, a partnership between the business publisher and Ashford University, a sprawling online for-profit college, launched in April.

Even the New York Times is in the process of creating NYT EDUcation, a series of courses and certificate programs with the CIG Education Group, an investment firm. And which teen-minded learner could look past the "online fashion certificate" being offered by a partnership of Teen Vogue and the Parsons School of Design?

In the case of Fortune and Cornell, the partnership will offer an 18-week class, which costs $3,600 and promises to blend lessons from Cornell professors with interviews and cases studies from the magazine's writers and editors.

The Fortune partnership, like those with Wired and TeenVogue, is backed by Qubed Education, a startup that hopes to make a business out of partnering big-name brands with educational institutions. CIG Education, in addition to the NYT venture, used the brand of the art auction house Sotheby's to create the Sotheby's Institute of Art, which offers master's degrees in three cities.

For media companies struggling to find new sources of revenue as print businesses die out, online education offers a chance to capitalize on their brands and the authority and trust they carry with consumers.

Fortune is owned by Time Inc., which spun off from the much-more-profitable Time Warner last year. In the wake of the spinoff, "we've really been looking to capitalize on our brands," said Jim Jacovides, Time Inc's senior vice president of international licensing and development.

"You're looking for a place where our brand resonates, and education is a space where it did. Cornell is a great school, so it was a good match," Jacovides told BuzzFeed News.

The Cornell certificate partnership is Time Inc.'s first foray into online education, and, it hopes, a testing ground for future programs. "This is, we hope, the beginning of many courses," said Jacovides. "The possibilities are endless for a lot of our other brands."

But for even the most recognized media brands, using online education to turn a high-name brand into a revenue stream is not easy. The New York Times has previously struggled to gain footing in the higher education. Its first such venture, a "Knowledge Network" that included courses taught by Times staffers and certificates offered in partnership with the University of Southern California, was killed in July of 2012.

For Cornell, USC, and Parsons, the media partnerships offer a chance to set their programs apart from similar offerings at other schools, said Rob Kingyens, the president and CEO of Qubed. "Cornell is a great school, but it's not the only one offering a business certificate," Kingyens said. "The value-add of a brand like Fortune is huge for students."

And for schools with little brand-recognition of their own, the proposition can be even more lucrative. Ashford University, for its part, paid $45 million to attach the Forbes brand to its business school.




Fortune Gets An Ivy League Partner For Online Business Education http://ift.tt/1V9CRds

Volkswagen CEO Resigns Amid Emissions Scandal

Sean Gallup / Getty Images

Volkswagen CEO Martin Winterkorn resigned Wednesday after revelations the automaker installed software in many of its diesel cars designed to cheat on emissions tests.

His resignation was announced at a press conference at VW headquarters in Wolfsburg, Germany.

The company's shares have tanked since U.S. federal environmental officials announced on Friday they had discovered a “defeat device” in 2009–2015 model Volkswagen and Audi diesel cars that uses sophisticated software to turn on full emissions controls only during official lab tests.

This is a developing news story. Check back for updates or follow BuzzFeed News on Twitter.



Volkswagen CEO Resigns Amid Emissions Scandal http://ift.tt/1iwDXOL

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Volkwagen's Nightmare Is About To Get Worse: Here Come The Lawyers

The next punishment for the German automaker’s allegedly fraudulent approach to emissions testing? Class action lawsuits.

Scott Olson / Getty Images

Volkswagen's reputation is in tatters and it faces billions of dollars in penalties, but perhaps the most terrifying phase of the nightmare is just beginning: The class-action lawyers are coming.

Law firm Hagens Berman, whose partner Steve Berman is an attorney in class-action litigation against General Motors over its faulty ignition switches, has been particularly fast out of the gate. It has already filed two complaints against Volkswagen, with the second complaint, filed yesterday, running 190 pages long, with plaintiffs from at least 20 states. The complaint brings over 70 counts against Volkswagen, citing different states' consumer protection laws, and asks for undisclosed damages including punitive damages and attorney fees.

Keller Rohrbank, another class-action firm, has filed its own complaint against Volkswagen, with 14 counts and 7 individual plaintiffs so far.

They're not the only lawyers circling in the bloodied waters. Bloomberg reports that the Justice Department is looking into Volkswagen's behavior and so is a group of U.S. Attorneys General, led by New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.

The group, which is still being formed, will look at whether Volkswagen violated state consumer protection laws as well as environmental protection laws, specifically Volkswagen's claims that it was selling "Clean Diesel" cars, a source familiar with the matter said.

Even amid such a frenzy, victory is far from guaranteed for the class-action lawyers.

"It is not unusual to have class actions follow regulatory developments," said Neal Walters, an attorney at Ballard Spahr who has defended corporations in product liability cases. "As serious as the allegations may be from the regulatory perspective, the class actions will not be as easy as they look."

The reason why, Walters said, is plaintiffs will have to show that buyers specifically bought the affected models because of their (possibly illusory) environmental benefits, or that their cars suffered a serious reduction in resale value due to the emissions scandal and its fallout.

Hagens Berman is trying to do just that.

"I paid a premium for a Golf TDI because I was promised that it was 'Clean Diesel.' I was told that the emissions were better than a standard gas automobile. In addition, I was also promised high fuel economy," one buyer says in the firm's announcement of its class-action suit. "I now feel I have been defrauded by these claims."

Max Kennerly, a lawyer at Tor Hoerman who blogs about litigation, guessed that lawsuits will follow whatever tweaks Volkswagen is required to make to get its cars in compliance with emissions rules. If that affects engine performance, "the car you own is not the car you thought you bought," he said. "Whenever you sell these things, you're going to lose some value."

Resale value will be particularly closely watched. Alec Gutierrez, a senior market analyst at Kelly Blue Book, said the value of affected cars could decline 3% to 5% in the second-hand markets. For example, a 2013 Golf Sportswagen TDI with a $16,000 Kelly Blue Book value could see its price decline $500 to $800, Gutierraz said, based on the experience of past models which experienced recalls.

Eric Ibara, an senior analyst at Kelly Blue Book, said retail values don't always take a hit. In the GM ignition case, used car values and retail values didn't decline at all, and in the wake of Toyota's unintended acceleration saga, resale values went back to normal within a year.

"This incident is different from the above two cases as Volkswagen's issue is not life-threatening but rather violates the trust with the buying public," Ibara said. "Should Volkswagen resort to incentives to move these vehicles later, this could adversely impact the strong residual values these vehicles currently enjoy."

There's a bigger challenge for lawyers looking to sue VW. "It is very difficult for class lawyers to prove diminution in value," Walters said. "There are any numbers of factors that influence what you pay and what you sell it for."

One group sure to benefit from a successful suit against Volkswagen will be the lawyers themselves. In late 2012, Toyota settled a class-action suit related to its unintended acceleration scandal, paying out $1.1 billion to owners of about 16 million eligible cars. Of that payout, $227 million went to the lawyers. One Toyota owner revealed his cut of the settlement in a Wall Street Journal op-ed: a check for $20.91.



Volkwagen's Nightmare Is About To Get Worse: Here Come The Lawyers http://ift.tt/1Kz8O4K

Groupon Says It's "Stronger Than Ever," Will Cut 1,100 Jobs

The deals site said today it’s cutting almost 10% of its workforce, and shuttering a number of its international sites.

Scott Olson / Getty Images

Deals website Groupon said today that it will cut 1,100 jobs, or 9% of the workforce it reported at the end of last year. In a blog post explaining the cuts, the company's chief operating officer wrote that the decision was a tough one to make, "especially when we believe we're stronger than ever."

The company is "doing all we can to make these transitions as easy as possible, but it's not easy to lose some great members of the Groupon family," COO Rich Williams wrote. "Yet just as our business has evolved from a largely hand-managed daily deal site to a true ecommerce technology platform, our operational model has to evolve."

He continued: "Evolution is hard, but it's a necessary part of our journey. It's also part of our DNA as a company and is one of the things that will help us realize our vision of creating the daily habit in local commerce."

It's tough to believe that Groupon is indeed stronger than ever.

The company's star has fallen significantly in the past five years, as it sought to rebrand itself as an e-commerce platform amid the decline of the daily-deal e-mail craze and growing competition. Groupon has posted a loss almost every quarter since it went public in late 2011. Its shares closed at $4.17 yesterday; they closed at $26.11 in Groupon's first day of trading after going public.

The cuts will focus on international positions and in customer service, as the company shutters its operations in markets including Morocco, Puerto Rico, Thailand and Uruguay. Groupon said in its annual report that it had 11,843 employees as of Dec. 31, 2014.

The cuts will be "substantially complete" by September 2016, according to a regulatory filing. Savings after 2015 "are expected to be primarily reinvested in the business," the company said.



Groupon Says It's "Stronger Than Ever," Will Cut 1,100 Jobs http://ift.tt/1LtWbfy

Walmart Is Joining The Hoverboard Craze

The world’s biggest retailer told BuzzFeed News it will sell the devices on its website — but not in stores — as early as Nov. 1.

Ethan Miller / Getty Images

The world's biggest retailer is getting in on the craze for "hoverboards" — the newly-popular non-levitating devices that also go by "self-balancing scooters" and "hands-free Segways." You know, the thing that Wiz Khalifa was riding around on when he got arrested at Los Angeles International Airport last month?

Walmart told BuzzFeed News it will start selling the self-balancing scooter — its chosen term for the item — on its U.S. website in time for the holiday season, which typically starts on Nov. 1.

It may arrive sooner depending on negotiations with suppliers, said Jaeme Laczkowski, a spokeswoman for Walmart.com. She added that "stores will likely see how well this sells and how popular it is" before making a decision to offer them in brick-and-mortar outlets.

"We've bought deep in this item because our buyers expect it to be a hot holiday gift, possibly as hot as the Razor Scooter since it skews more towards adults," she said.

vine.co

Most hoverboards cost anywhere from $300 to $500 on Amazon, with the big name IO Hawk version listing an $1,800 price on its website, where it's backordered. Walmart doesn't yet have specifics on its prices, but said it will offer a base model and prices will go up from there. Customers can expect to see a low price, though Walmart can't guarantee the lowest price every time, the spokeswoman said.

While the retailer is enthusiastic about the device, it seems to be tempering its bet by waiting before placing it in its more than 4,500 U.S. stores.

"The fact we bought deep in it is because we have confidence it's going to be a hot item, but until we make it available to purchase online and see some of those initial sales come in, I can't really forecast how hot it's going to be," Laczkowski said.


View Entire List ›



Walmart Is Joining The Hoverboard Craze http://ift.tt/1QWEhCl

Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein Diagnosed With Lymphoma

The bank chief said his disease is “highly curable” and “my doctors’ and my own expectation is that it will be cured.”

Nicholas Kamm / AFP / Getty Images

Goldman Sachs chairman and CEO Lloyd Blankfein told his employees, clients and shareholders today that he has been diagnosed with lymphoma. Blankfein said in his message that he first sought treatment after "several weeks of not feeling well" this summer, and received a lymphoma diagnosis after a biopsy. He said that his doctors say his form of lymphoma is "highly curable."

Blankfein, who is 61 years old, is one of two major Wall Street bank CEOs who have been in their jobs since before the financial crisis. The other, JPMorgan Chase chief Jamie Dimon, was diagnosed with throat cancer in July, 2014 and after undergoing treatment, said in December, 2014 that there was "no evidence" of cancer remaining.

Blankfein has been Goldman's CEO and chairman since 2006.

Blankfein did not disclose which type of lymphoma he had been diagnosed with. Lymphoma refers to blood cancers that develop in the lymphatic system. According to the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, the five-year survival rate for Hodgkin lymphoma diagnoses between 2004 and 2010 was 88%, while the survival rate for non-Hodgkin lymphoma was 71%

Like Dimon, Blankfein said he would continue working through chemotherapy treatment. Blankfein said he would "reduce some of my previously planned travel during the treatment period."

To my colleagues, our clients and our shareholders,

Late this summer after several weeks of not feeling well, I underwent a series of tests, which culminated in a biopsy last week. After the biopsy, I was told by my doctors that I have lymphoma. Fortunately, my form of lymphoma is highly curable and my doctors' and my own expectation is that I will be cured.

My treatment plan will include chemotherapy over the next several months in New York. My doctors have advised me that during the treatment, I will be able to work substantially as normal, leading the firm. I will, however, reduce some of my previously planned travel during the treatment period. I have discussed this approach with our Board of Directors and they are supportive.

There are many people who are dealing with cancer every day. I draw on their experiences as I begin my own. I have a lot of energy and I'm anxious to begin the treatment. I appreciate your support and good wishes.

Lloyd


View Entire List ›



Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein Diagnosed With Lymphoma http://ift.tt/1WfzVsZ

Starbucks Starts Taking Orders By App Nationwide Today

Ordering via smartphone means customers can skip the line, and Starbucks can boost sales during rush hour. Here’s how the app will work.

Francisco Ramos Sabugo Rodriguez / Via Starbucks.com

It's a big day for people sick of standing in line for their latte: Starbucks is launching mobile ordering nationwide on Tuesday, following a limited rollout that started last December. Customers in the U.S. will be able to order and pay for food and drink using the Starbucks app in both iOS and Android devices. All that's left to do is walk into the store and pick it up.

The service will be available at the chain's 7,400 company-owned stores in the U.S. (it already had rolled out to about 4,000 by summer), but not the thousands of other locations run by licensees (for example, those in Target). The chain will also offer it in some locations in the U.K. and Canada later this year.

"Mobile order and pay is clearly the initiative that investors are most excited about at this juncture, and rightly so, in our opinion," stated an analyst report by the firm William Blair.

More fast food chains are developing technology that allows consumers to place their orders themselves. Panera and Taco Bell have also rolled out mobile ordering apps, while others like McDonald's are installing in-store kiosks.

Already, about one-in-five Starbucks customers pay by app, which helps to speed up the line. The company hopes that by eliminating, or at least reducing, wait times by allowing customers to order before they arrive, people will be more willing to stop in during the morning rush hour, or when they have little time to spend in line. For those who don't want to step foot in a Starbucks at all, the chain is also working on a delivery service, which will mainly target customers placing group orders.

In test markets in the Pacific Northwest, mobile ordering helped Starbucks to increase sales. "Mobile order and pay is fueling both revenue and profit growth in every market in which it has been deployed," CEO Howard Schultz told investors in July.

Here's how it will work.

First, you'll need to open the Starbucks app, and have some money in your account, of course.

First, you'll need to open the Starbucks app, and have some money in your account, of course.

Venessa Wong/BuzzFeed News

Select your drinks and food. The entire menu is available on mobile order.

Select your drinks and food. The entire menu is available on mobile order.

Venessa Wong/BuzzFeed News


View Entire List ›



Starbucks Starts Taking Orders By App Nationwide Today http://ift.tt/1QWjtL3

Monday, September 21, 2015

Why Twitter Search i


via Alecia Stringer http://ift.tt/1Qv1avJ

How Elite Colleges Rate On Obama's New Scorecard

Even among America’s top-ranked schools, there are huge disparities.

Daniel Hulshizer / ASSOCIATED PRESS

So which of America's elite schools perform best — and worst — on Obama's metrics?

BuzzFeed News examined the data of national universities and liberal arts colleges ranked in the top 25 by US News and World Report.

Here's how the country's best schools stack up:


View Entire List ›



How Elite Colleges Rate On Obama's New Scorecard http://ift.tt/1Oqcqfr